Einstein not ILE

[Deleted Member 44]

Despite what been said everywhere. Checked Gulenko typing he have him as ILI.

He actually seemed more ILI or LII at first to me when was in process to find my own type ect but I really didn't know much . Idk he seemed obviously more introverted to me not ILE energy but there is so little footage of him. He look more ILI in the eyes too the look of victimization idk how to really explain tbh.

Then i saw him being typed ILE everywhere in descriptions for ILE was used as main example everytime ect but a lot of those are old but idk i just took it and assumed he was ILE.


Its related to this made a thread about some socionics issues

ILE bias​

The ILE bias comes from Augusta herself and is closely related to the one above. According to Augusta's original conception of type roles, ILEs were seen as being a type that sees the hidden roots of phenomena (supposedly NE) and arranges them into a system or theory (TI). For many years Augusta and her associates assumed that scientists and thinkers who generated new theories were ILEs (people like Einstein, Bohr, Newton, and Darwin). Later, she and others seemed to recognize this mistake, but the ILE bias has still not been completely undone. Just as "health" does not equate exactly to SI "theory" does not equate exactly to TI, and people of different types may tend to generate theories of a slightly different nature.

Full thread

Damn - Socionics issues?

Forer effect The Forer effect (also called personal validation fallacy or the Barnum effect after P. T. Barnum) is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and...

rnc.life

Now peoples discuss but me I'll go with ILI.

 

[Deleted Member 44]

Ray peat retardcel moment tbh monkey, preconception language, got fooled.

 

[Deleted Member 44]

Even some other sociotype examples i put on quadra guide i wasn't really sure enough just took them from that site where people voted but idk Einstein was a bit more surprised didn't thought people had him wrong and was more trusting.

Don't get me wrong i didn't mindlessly just choosed the first example with most votes on the sites too i took some where I myself had already idea of or even other weren't even voted there just i knew from personal observations. I knew you couldn't entirely trust others voting but also had to start off the section at the time thought ill correct everything later which i did progressively.

 

[Deleted Member 44]

Why rage @KJ im saying ray peat was right