Communism

KJ

Class Conscious
Joined
Jan 5, 2022
Messages
6,900
Reaction score
6,448
BC
฿4,697
Dividends
0
How come former USSR citizens claim that the country was basically a wonderland, while Cubans say that communism destroyed Cuba? What were the differences that lead to such different outcomes?
 

Ryan Garcia

Ima knock you out and take yo girl
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Messages
1,001
Reaction score
1,287
BC
฿7
Dividends
0
Well, the USSR had the most natural resources and a high population (289 million in 1990), so these factors would offset the economic inefficient of the socialist system. It is true that before the bolshevik revolution, russia was just a poor agrarian country. By the 1950s, it was an industrial powerhouse. So many view communism as the reason why that occurred. Eastern europe was incorporated as the "eastern bloc" and it was plundered after ww2. Machinery and capital were sent off to Russia
. Cuba became dependent on the soviet union when it came to trade, and it wasn't the only them that were dependent. So when many countries depend on you for their survival and you're the "big dog", it is easy to stay afloat. It is important to note that while the USSR was proficient in machinery and heavy industry, consumer goods were rather scarce. Food shortages were not rare and stores barely had food in them, but it was the only thing they were used to and known. When the USSR was no more, Cuba almost collapsed. But they made economic reforms in 1993 which sorta stabilized the country. So it is no longer full socialist, but rather a mix of capitalism and socialism but closer to socialism.
Cuba has also been exposed to the west far more than Russia, so they're less hostile to capitalism. Russia has been stagnant since the 90s so many russians miss socialist times.
 

Mindset

Realest
Top Poster Of Month
Joined
Jan 5, 2022
Messages
8,533
Reaction score
7,959
BC
฿8,570
Dividends
13
Well, the USSR had the most natural resources and a high population (289 million in 1990), so these factors would offset the economic inefficient of the socialist system. It is true that before the bolshevik revolution, russia was just a poor agrarian country. By the 1950s, it was an industrial powerhouse. So many view communism as the reason why that occurred. Eastern europe was incorporated as the "eastern bloc" and it was plundered after ww2. Machinery and capital were sent off to Russia
. Cuba became dependent on the soviet union when it came to trade, and it wasn't the only them that were dependent. So when many countries depend on you for their survival and you're the "big dog", it is easy to stay afloat. It is important to note that while the USSR was proficient in machinery and heavy industry, consumer goods were rather scarce. Food shortages were not rare and stores barely had food in them, but it was the only thing they were used to and known. When the USSR was no more, Cuba almost collapsed. But they made economic reforms in 1993 which sorta stabilized the country. So it is no longer full socialist, but rather a mix of capitalism and socialism but closer to socialism.
Cuba has also been exposed to the west far more than Russia, so they're less hostile to capitalism. Russia has been stagnant since the 90s so many russians miss socialist times.
1648483277065.gif
 

Augusto

General
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
127
Reaction score
352
BC
฿0
Dividends
0
Well, the USSR had the most natural resources and a high population (289 million in 1990), so these factors would offset the economic inefficient of the socialist system. It is true that before the bolshevik revolution, russia was just a poor agrarian country. By the 1950s, it was an industrial powerhouse. So many view communism as the reason why that occurred. Eastern europe was incorporated as the "eastern bloc" and it was plundered after ww2. Machinery and capital were sent off to Russia
. Cuba became dependent on the soviet union when it came to trade, and it wasn't the only them that were dependent. So when many countries depend on you for their survival and you're the "big dog", it is easy to stay afloat. It is important to note that while the USSR was proficient in machinery and heavy industry, consumer goods were rather scarce. Food shortages were not rare and stores barely had food in them, but it was the only thing they were used to and known. When the USSR was no more, Cuba almost collapsed. But they made economic reforms in 1993 which sorta stabilized the country. So it is no longer full socialist, but rather a mix of capitalism and socialism but closer to socialism.
Cuba has also been exposed to the west far more than Russia, so they're less hostile to capitalism. Russia has been stagnant since the 90s so many russians miss socialist times.
mirin your knowledgemaxxing
 
  • :)
  • :trolljak:
  • :yb:
  • :thumbsupsoyjak
  • :meds:
  • :cigar:
  • :soy4:
  • :babysoyjak:
  • :blacksoyjak:
  • :wepa:
  • :devioussoyjak:
  • :closedeyedsoyjak
  • :neutralsoyjak:
  • :songus:
  • :soy3:
  • :soyddit:
  • :itsover:
  • :tunes:
  • :jfl:
  • :wat:
  • :shrek:
  • :soy:
  • :sand:
  • :bateman:
  • :real:
  • :peat:
  • :qrn:
  • :feelsuhh:
  • :macaco:
  • :ohreally:
  • :rnc2:
  • :soy2:
  • ;)
  • :(
  • :mad:
  • :confused:
  • :cool:
  • :p
  • :D
  • :eek:
  • :oops:
  • :rolleyes:
  • o_O
  • :cautious:
  • :censored:
  • :cry:
  • :love:
  • :LOL:
  • :ROFLMAO:
  • :sick:
  • :sleep:
  • :sneaky:
  • (y)
  • (n)
  • :unsure:
  • :whistle:
  • :coffee:
  • :giggle:
  • :alien:
  • :devilish:
  • :geek:
  • :poop:
  • :ninja:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top