Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Information
World News
Supreme Court sides with coach who sought to pray after game
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WPLG" data-source="post: 45261" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>The Supreme Court on Monday sided with <a href="https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-sports-business-religion-donald-trump-d5817d75d8b3ae436ee2b66eed5ca7dc" target="_blank">a football coach from Washington state</a> who sought to kneel and pray on the field after games.</p><p></p><p>The court <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf" target="_blank">ruled 6-3</a> along ideological lines for the coach. The justices said the coach's prayer was protected by the First Amendment.</p><p></p><p>“The Constitution and the best of our traditions counsel mutual respect and tolerance, not censorship and suppression, for religious and nonreligious views alike,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority.</p><p></p><p>The case forced the justices to wrestle with how to balance the religious and free speech rights of teachers and coaches with the rights of students not to feel pressured into participating in religious practices. The outcome could strengthen the acceptability of some religious practices in the public school setting.</p><p></p><p>The decision is also the latest in a line of Supreme Court rulings for religious plaintiffs. In another recent example, the court <a href="https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-decision-religious-schools-aid-85645580702ed5ff125cf9760024ae89" target="_blank">ruled that Maine</a> can’t exclude religious schools from a program that offers tuition aid for private education, a decision that could ease religious organizations’ access to taxpayer money.</p><p></p><p>That the court ruled for the coach is perhaps not surprising. In 2019, the court declined to take up the case at an early stage, but four of the court’s conservatives agreed that a lower court decision in favor of the school district was “troubling” for its “understanding of the free speech rights of public school teachers.”</p><p></p><p>The case before the justices involved Joseph Kennedy, a Christian and former football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Washington. Kennedy started coaching at the school in 2008 and initially prayed alone on the 50-yard line at the end of games. But students started joining him, and over time he began to deliver a short, inspirational talk with religious references. Kennedy did that for years and led students in locker room prayers. The school district learned what he was doing in 2015 and asked him to stop.</p><p></p><p>Kennedy stopped leading students in prayer in the locker room and on the field but wanted to continue praying on the field himself, with students free to join if they wished. Concerned about being sued for violating students’ religious freedom rights, the school asked him to stop his practice of kneeling and praying while still “on duty” as a coach after the game. The school tried to work out a solution so Kennedy could pray privately before or after the game. When he continued to kneel and pray on the field, the school put him on paid leave.</p><p></p><p>Three justices on the court attended public high schools themselves while the rest attended Catholic schools.</p><p></p><p>The case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 21-418.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/06/27/supreme-court-sides-with-coach-who-sought-to-pray-after-game/" target="_blank">Continue reading...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WPLG, post: 45261, member: 158"] The Supreme Court on Monday sided with [URL='https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-sports-business-religion-donald-trump-d5817d75d8b3ae436ee2b66eed5ca7dc']a football coach from Washington state[/URL] who sought to kneel and pray on the field after games. The court [URL='https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf']ruled 6-3[/URL] along ideological lines for the coach. The justices said the coach's prayer was protected by the First Amendment. “The Constitution and the best of our traditions counsel mutual respect and tolerance, not censorship and suppression, for religious and nonreligious views alike,” Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority. The case forced the justices to wrestle with how to balance the religious and free speech rights of teachers and coaches with the rights of students not to feel pressured into participating in religious practices. The outcome could strengthen the acceptability of some religious practices in the public school setting. The decision is also the latest in a line of Supreme Court rulings for religious plaintiffs. In another recent example, the court [URL='https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-decision-religious-schools-aid-85645580702ed5ff125cf9760024ae89']ruled that Maine[/URL] can’t exclude religious schools from a program that offers tuition aid for private education, a decision that could ease religious organizations’ access to taxpayer money. That the court ruled for the coach is perhaps not surprising. In 2019, the court declined to take up the case at an early stage, but four of the court’s conservatives agreed that a lower court decision in favor of the school district was “troubling” for its “understanding of the free speech rights of public school teachers.” The case before the justices involved Joseph Kennedy, a Christian and former football coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Washington. Kennedy started coaching at the school in 2008 and initially prayed alone on the 50-yard line at the end of games. But students started joining him, and over time he began to deliver a short, inspirational talk with religious references. Kennedy did that for years and led students in locker room prayers. The school district learned what he was doing in 2015 and asked him to stop. Kennedy stopped leading students in prayer in the locker room and on the field but wanted to continue praying on the field himself, with students free to join if they wished. Concerned about being sued for violating students’ religious freedom rights, the school asked him to stop his practice of kneeling and praying while still “on duty” as a coach after the game. The school tried to work out a solution so Kennedy could pray privately before or after the game. When he continued to kneel and pray on the field, the school put him on paid leave. Three justices on the court attended public high schools themselves while the rest attended Catholic schools. The case is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 21-418. [url="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/06/27/supreme-court-sides-with-coach-who-sought-to-pray-after-game/"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Information
World News
Supreme Court sides with coach who sought to pray after game
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top