Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Information
World News
Supreme Court denies Broward ministry’s petition over ‘hate group’ designation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WPLG" data-source="post: 46410" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>The Supreme Court recently declined to review a Broward County megachurch’s petition to review the high standard that public figures and entities face during defamation lawsuits.</p><p></p><p>The petitioner was <a href="https://www.djameskennedy.org/" target="_blank">D. James Kennedy Ministries</a>, formerly known as the Coral Ridge Ministries for its association with the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, at 5555 N Federal Hwy., in Fort Lauderdale.</p><p></p><p>It was the conclusion of years of lawsuits against the <a href="https://www.splcenter.org/20220309/year-hate-extremism-report-2021" target="_blank">Southern Poverty Law Center</a>, a nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation, over “a hate group” designation.</p><p></p><p>“This is a victory for the Southern Poverty Law Center, for responsible journalists, as well as for investigative organizations across the country who work to expose the hate and extremism that infects our daily life across the U.S.,” Margaret Huang, the SPLC president and chief executive officer, said in a statement.</p><p></p><p>The conflict began after Amazon Smile declined to allow the ministry to use the site for fundraising over the designation. The ministry filed a defamation lawsuit in 2017.</p><p></p><p>SPLC, which has been publishing the annual “<a href="https://www.splcenter.org/20220309/year-hate-extremism-report-2021" target="_blank">The Year in Hate & Extremism Report</a>” for years, cited the DJKM campaigns against same-sex marriage to support the designation.</p><p></p><p>The ministry, represented by attorneys with <a href="https://www.ncll.org/" target="_blank">the National Center of Life and Liberty</a>, maintained that although it “opposes homosexual conduct” based on its religious beliefs, it is in no sense a “hate group.”</p><p></p><p>SPLC responded that the designation was protected by the First Amendment.</p><p></p><p>“Any organization we list as a hate group is free to use their own First Amendment free speech rights to disagree with us about our designation,” Huang said in a statement.</p><p></p><p>The ministry petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-802.html" target="_blank">on Oct. 14, 2021</a>, to revisit <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/" target="_blank">New York Times Co v. Sullivan</a>. The landmark 1964 ruling forces public figures and entities to prove “actual malice” to win a defamation claim. The ministry contested the public entity should not be held to that high standard of proof.</p><p></p><p>The Supreme Court denied the ministry’s petition on Monday putting an end to the legal battle. As a public entity, the ministry had to prove three elements to rebut the protection of the First Amendment: The designation had to be “provably false,” “actually false,” and made with “actual malice.”</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-802_o759.pdf" target="_blank">The court’s opinion </a>was that SPLC’s “hate group” designation was not “false because ‘hate group’ has a highly debatable and ambiguous meaning.” Thomas was the only dissenting vote.</p><p></p><p>“This case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity,” Thomas wrote in his <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062722zor_b97d.pdf" target="_blank">brief dissent</a>.</p><p></p><p>Rev. D. James Kennedy founded the ministry in 1974 and died in 2007. Rev. Rob Pacienza is the DJKM president and chief executive officer. He refused to comment on this story.</p><p></p><p>A representative released a statement: “DJK Ministries is thankful for the time and effort given to our case by the United States Supreme Court. We are thankful for Justice Thomas’ thoughtful and detailed dissent, and we agree with his comments.”</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.local10.com/news/local/2022/06/29/supreme-court-denies-broward-ministrys-petition-over-hate-group-designation/" target="_blank">Continue reading...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WPLG, post: 46410, member: 158"] The Supreme Court recently declined to review a Broward County megachurch’s petition to review the high standard that public figures and entities face during defamation lawsuits. The petitioner was [URL='https://www.djameskennedy.org/']D. James Kennedy Ministries[/URL], formerly known as the Coral Ridge Ministries for its association with the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, at 5555 N Federal Hwy., in Fort Lauderdale. It was the conclusion of years of lawsuits against the [URL='https://www.splcenter.org/20220309/year-hate-extremism-report-2021']Southern Poverty Law Center[/URL], a nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation, over “a hate group” designation. “This is a victory for the Southern Poverty Law Center, for responsible journalists, as well as for investigative organizations across the country who work to expose the hate and extremism that infects our daily life across the U.S.,” Margaret Huang, the SPLC president and chief executive officer, said in a statement. The conflict began after Amazon Smile declined to allow the ministry to use the site for fundraising over the designation. The ministry filed a defamation lawsuit in 2017. SPLC, which has been publishing the annual “[URL='https://www.splcenter.org/20220309/year-hate-extremism-report-2021']The Year in Hate & Extremism Report[/URL]” for years, cited the DJKM campaigns against same-sex marriage to support the designation. The ministry, represented by attorneys with [URL='https://www.ncll.org/']the National Center of Life and Liberty[/URL], maintained that although it “opposes homosexual conduct” based on its religious beliefs, it is in no sense a “hate group.” SPLC responded that the designation was protected by the First Amendment. “Any organization we list as a hate group is free to use their own First Amendment free speech rights to disagree with us about our designation,” Huang said in a statement. The ministry petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court [URL='https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-802.html']on Oct. 14, 2021[/URL], to revisit [URL='https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/376/254/']New York Times Co v. Sullivan[/URL]. The landmark 1964 ruling forces public figures and entities to prove “actual malice” to win a defamation claim. The ministry contested the public entity should not be held to that high standard of proof. The Supreme Court denied the ministry’s petition on Monday putting an end to the legal battle. As a public entity, the ministry had to prove three elements to rebut the protection of the First Amendment: The designation had to be “provably false,” “actually false,” and made with “actual malice.” [URL='https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-802_o759.pdf']The court’s opinion [/URL]was that SPLC’s “hate group” designation was not “false because ‘hate group’ has a highly debatable and ambiguous meaning.” Thomas was the only dissenting vote. “This case is one of many showing how New York Times and its progeny have allowed media organizations and interest groups to cast false aspersions on public figures with near impunity,” Thomas wrote in his [URL='https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/062722zor_b97d.pdf']brief dissent[/URL]. Rev. D. James Kennedy founded the ministry in 1974 and died in 2007. Rev. Rob Pacienza is the DJKM president and chief executive officer. He refused to comment on this story. A representative released a statement: “DJK Ministries is thankful for the time and effort given to our case by the United States Supreme Court. We are thankful for Justice Thomas’ thoughtful and detailed dissent, and we agree with his comments.” [url="https://www.local10.com/news/local/2022/06/29/supreme-court-denies-broward-ministrys-petition-over-hate-group-designation/"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Information
World News
Supreme Court denies Broward ministry’s petition over ‘hate group’ designation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top