Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Menu
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Information
World News
Supreme Court blocks Texas law on social media censorship
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WPLG" data-source="post: 34621" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>A divided Supreme Court has blocked a Texas law, championed by conservatives, that aimed to keep social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter from censoring users based on their viewpoints.</p><p></p><p>The court voted in an unusual 5-4 alignment Tuesday to put the Texas law on hold, while a lawsuit plays out in lower courts.</p><p></p><p>Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted to grant the emergency request from two technology industry groups that challenged the law in federal court.</p><p></p><p>The majority provided no explanation for its decision, as is common in emergency matters on what is informally known as the court's “shadow docket.”</p><p></p><p>Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect.</p><p></p><p>In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.”</p><p></p><p>It's not clear how the high court's past First Amendment cases, many of which predate the internet age, apply to Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and other digital platforms, Alito wrote in an opinion joined by fellow conservatives Thomas and Gorsuch but not Kagan.</p><p></p><p>The order follows <a href="https://apnews.com/article/politics-technology-legislature-e5d0a304765858aa96bd6c68b61ad055" target="_blank">a ruling last week</a> by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found a similar Florida law likely violates the First Amendment’s free speech protections.</p><p></p><p>Republican elected officials in several states have backed laws like those enacted in Florida and Texas that sought to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.</p><p></p><p>The Texas law was initially blocked by a district judge, but then allowed to take effect by a panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/05/31/supreme-court-blocks-texas-law-on-social-media-censorship/" target="_blank">Continue reading...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WPLG, post: 34621, member: 158"] A divided Supreme Court has blocked a Texas law, championed by conservatives, that aimed to keep social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter from censoring users based on their viewpoints. The court voted in an unusual 5-4 alignment Tuesday to put the Texas law on hold, while a lawsuit plays out in lower courts. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted to grant the emergency request from two technology industry groups that challenged the law in federal court. The majority provided no explanation for its decision, as is common in emergency matters on what is informally known as the court's “shadow docket.” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect. In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.” It's not clear how the high court's past First Amendment cases, many of which predate the internet age, apply to Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and other digital platforms, Alito wrote in an opinion joined by fellow conservatives Thomas and Gorsuch but not Kagan. The order follows [URL='https://apnews.com/article/politics-technology-legislature-e5d0a304765858aa96bd6c68b61ad055']a ruling last week[/URL] by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that found a similar Florida law likely violates the First Amendment’s free speech protections. Republican elected officials in several states have backed laws like those enacted in Florida and Texas that sought to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right. The Texas law was initially blocked by a district judge, but then allowed to take effect by a panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. [url="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/05/31/supreme-court-blocks-texas-law-on-social-media-censorship/"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Information
World News
Supreme Court blocks Texas law on social media censorship
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top