Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KJ" data-source="post: 71031" data-attributes="member: 1">And the opposite premise applies.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35850539/[/URL]Exposure to environmental cues reflecting potential threats to future survivability is associated with a stronger endorsement of short-term mating strategies. Less is known, however, about the effects of safety and security cues. In four studies, we examined the effects of attachment-related security cues compared to neutral cues on preferences for short- and long-term mating strategies. Preferences were assessed using self-report and behavioral measures. In line with Life History Theory (LHT) and our hypotheses, exposure to attachment-related security cues was mainly associated with a stronger preference for long-term mating strategies and a weaker preference for short-term strategies. Our internal meta-analysis of the experimental security manipulations across studies provided further support for the association between state attachment security and endorsement of mating strategies. We also found some predictable effects of gender and relationship status. Implications for LHT and attachment theory are discussed. (139 words).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KJ, post: 71031, member: 1"] And the opposite premise applies. [URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35850539/[/URL] [B]Exposure to environmental cues reflecting potential threats to future survivability is associated with a stronger endorsement of short-term mating strategies.[/B] Less is known, however, about the effects of safety and security cues. In four studies, we examined the effects of attachment-related security cues compared to neutral cues on preferences for short- and long-term mating strategies. Preferences were assessed using self-report and behavioral measures. In line with Life History Theory (LHT) and our hypotheses,[B] exposure to attachment-related security cues was mainly associated with a stronger preference for long-term mating strategies and a weaker preference for short-term strategies[/B]. Our internal meta-analysis of the experimental security manipulations across studies provided further support for the association between state attachment security and endorsement of mating strategies. We also found some predictable effects of gender and relationship status. Implications for LHT and attachment theory are discussed. (139 words). [/QUOTE]

Verification