Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="WPLG" data-source="post: 54215" data-attributes="member: 158"><a href="https://apnews.com/hub/steve-bannon" target="_blank">Steve Bannon's</a> lawyers are expected Thursday to begin their defense of the former adviser to then-President Donald Trump as Bannon's contempt of Congress trial enters a new phase.Bannon was in an unofficial capacity to Trump at the time of <a href="https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege" target="_blank">the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021</a> and is charged with defying a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the aftermath of the 2020 election and the events leading up to the riot.It is unclear whether Bannon, 68, will take the stand or whom the defense might call as witnesses.Bannon was indicted in November on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress, a month after the Justice Department received the House panel's referral. Each count carries a minimum of 30 days of jail and as long as a year behind bars.The Justice Department rested its case Wednesday after calling just two witnesses: Kristin Amerling, the House committee’s chief counsel, and FBI special agent Stephen Hart. The prosecution's case was dominated by testimony from Amerling, who explained the extent to which the committee tried to engage Bannon and the timeline leading up to the missed deadline.Bannon’s lawyer tried Wednesday to establish that the deadline for the onetime Trump strategist to appear before the House committee investigating the Capitol riot was flexible as long as the two sides were on negotiating terms.Bannon lawyer Evan Corcoran asked Amerling whether it was common for witnesses to appear before a congressional committee several weeks after the deadline date on a subpoena. Amerling answered “yes,” but added only “when witnesses are cooperating with the committee.”Amerling said Bannon was uncooperative from the start, so there was no such leeway.The committee heard nothing from Bannon until after the first deadline had passed, at which point his lawyer sent a letter to the committee stating that Bannon was protected by Trump’s claim of executive privilege and would not be providing documents or appearing. The committee responded in writing that Trump’s claim was invalid — Trump was no longer president and Bannon was not employed at the White House at the time of the riot.The panel gave Bannon a hard deadline of Oct. 14 to come before the committee. When that deadline passed, the committee chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., wrote Bannon’s lawyer on Oct. 15 threatening criminal prosecution.The committee, which is <a href="https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-donald-trump-adam-kinzinger-government-and-politics-0b30b6cbb15de42b1f27a139d067d556" target="_blank">holding a prime time hearing</a> Thursday, wanted to wanted to speak with Bannon because it had information that Bannon was actively involved in planning, logistics and fundraising for Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and stop Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s victory. The subpoena demanded any documents or communications relating to Trump and other people in his orbit, including lawyer Rudy Giuliani and extremist groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.The emphasis on the subpoena timeline is one of the few avenues of defense that U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols left Bannon’s legal team after <a href="https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-steve-bannon-donald-trump-congress-government-and-politics-d7f38a2e00b2947c4f553ef81d78790a" target="_blank">a hearing last week</a>. Nichols ruled that major elements of Bannon’s planned defense were irrelevant and could not be introduced in court. The judge said Bannon could not claim he believed he was covered by executive privilege, which allows presidents to withhold confidential information from the courts and the legislative branch, or that he was acting on the advice of his lawyers.In opening statements Corcoran argued that the charges against him were politically motivated and that Bannon was engaged in good-faith negotiations with the congressional committee when he was charged.“No one ignored the subpoena,” Corcoran told the jury.In reality, Corcoran said, one of Bannon’s previous lawyers, Robert Costello, contacted an attorney for the House committee to express some of Bannon’s concerns about testifying.“They did what two lawyers do. They negotiated,” Corcoran said, adding that Bannon and his legal team believed “the dates of the subpoena were not fixed; they were flexible.”Follow AP’s coverage of the Jan. 6 committee hearings at <a href="https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege" target="_blank">https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege</a><a href="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/07/21/steve-bannons-defense-to-begin-in-trump-advisers-trial/" target="_blank">Continue reading...</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="WPLG, post: 54215, member: 158"] [URL='https://apnews.com/hub/steve-bannon']Steve Bannon's[/URL] lawyers are expected Thursday to begin their defense of the former adviser to then-President Donald Trump as Bannon's contempt of Congress trial enters a new phase. Bannon was in an unofficial capacity to Trump at the time of [URL='https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege']the insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021[/URL] and is charged with defying a congressional subpoena from the House committee investigating the aftermath of the 2020 election and the events leading up to the riot. It is unclear whether Bannon, 68, will take the stand or whom the defense might call as witnesses. Bannon was indicted in November on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress, a month after the Justice Department received the House panel's referral. Each count carries a minimum of 30 days of jail and as long as a year behind bars. The Justice Department rested its case Wednesday after calling just two witnesses: Kristin Amerling, the House committee’s chief counsel, and FBI special agent Stephen Hart. The prosecution's case was dominated by testimony from Amerling, who explained the extent to which the committee tried to engage Bannon and the timeline leading up to the missed deadline. Bannon’s lawyer tried Wednesday to establish that the deadline for the onetime Trump strategist to appear before the House committee investigating the Capitol riot was flexible as long as the two sides were on negotiating terms. Bannon lawyer Evan Corcoran asked Amerling whether it was common for witnesses to appear before a congressional committee several weeks after the deadline date on a subpoena. Amerling answered “yes,” but added only “when witnesses are cooperating with the committee.” Amerling said Bannon was uncooperative from the start, so there was no such leeway. The committee heard nothing from Bannon until after the first deadline had passed, at which point his lawyer sent a letter to the committee stating that Bannon was protected by Trump’s claim of executive privilege and would not be providing documents or appearing. The committee responded in writing that Trump’s claim was invalid — Trump was no longer president and Bannon was not employed at the White House at the time of the riot. The panel gave Bannon a hard deadline of Oct. 14 to come before the committee. When that deadline passed, the committee chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., wrote Bannon’s lawyer on Oct. 15 threatening criminal prosecution. The committee, which is [URL='https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-donald-trump-adam-kinzinger-government-and-politics-0b30b6cbb15de42b1f27a139d067d556']holding a prime time hearing[/URL] Thursday, wanted to wanted to speak with Bannon because it had information that Bannon was actively involved in planning, logistics and fundraising for Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and stop Congress from certifying Joe Biden’s victory. The subpoena demanded any documents or communications relating to Trump and other people in his orbit, including lawyer Rudy Giuliani and extremist groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. The emphasis on the subpoena timeline is one of the few avenues of defense that U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols left Bannon’s legal team after [URL='https://apnews.com/article/capitol-siege-steve-bannon-donald-trump-congress-government-and-politics-d7f38a2e00b2947c4f553ef81d78790a']a hearing last week[/URL]. Nichols ruled that major elements of Bannon’s planned defense were irrelevant and could not be introduced in court. The judge said Bannon could not claim he believed he was covered by executive privilege, which allows presidents to withhold confidential information from the courts and the legislative branch, or that he was acting on the advice of his lawyers. In opening statements Corcoran argued that the charges against him were politically motivated and that Bannon was engaged in good-faith negotiations with the congressional committee when he was charged. “No one ignored the subpoena,” Corcoran told the jury. In reality, Corcoran said, one of Bannon’s previous lawyers, Robert Costello, contacted an attorney for the House committee to express some of Bannon’s concerns about testifying. “They did what two lawyers do. They negotiated,” Corcoran said, adding that Bannon and his legal team believed “the dates of the subpoena were not fixed; they were flexible.” Follow AP’s coverage of the Jan. 6 committee hearings at [URL]https://apnews.com/hub/capitol-siege[/URL] [url="https://www.local10.com/news/politics/2022/07/21/steve-bannons-defense-to-begin-in-trump-advisers-trial/"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification