Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Menu
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Real Corner
Real Corner
Mate Preferences Seldomly Correlate With Real Mate Choices
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KJ" data-source="post: 71547" data-attributes="member: 1"><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25344347/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Mate preferences often fail to correspond with actual mate choices. We present a novel explanation for this phenomenon: People overestimate their willingness to reject unsuitable romantic partners. In two studies, single people were given the opportunity to accept or decline advances from potential dates who were physically unattractive (Study 1) or incompatible with their dating preferences (Study 2). We found that<strong> participants were significantly less willing to reject these unsuitable potential dates when they believed the situation to be real rather than hypothetical.</strong> This effect was partially explained by other-focused motives: Participants for whom the scenario was hypothetical anticipated less motivation to avoid hurting the potential date's feelings than participants actually felt when they believed the situation to be real. Thus, <strong>other-focused motives appear to exert an influence on mate choice that has been overlooked by researchers and laypeople alike</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KJ, post: 71547, member: 1"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25344347/[/URL] Mate preferences often fail to correspond with actual mate choices. We present a novel explanation for this phenomenon: People overestimate their willingness to reject unsuitable romantic partners. In two studies, single people were given the opportunity to accept or decline advances from potential dates who were physically unattractive (Study 1) or incompatible with their dating preferences (Study 2). We found that[B] participants were significantly less willing to reject these unsuitable potential dates when they believed the situation to be real rather than hypothetical.[/B] This effect was partially explained by other-focused motives: Participants for whom the scenario was hypothetical anticipated less motivation to avoid hurting the potential date's feelings than participants actually felt when they believed the situation to be real. Thus, [B]other-focused motives appear to exert an influence on mate choice that has been overlooked by researchers and laypeople alike[/B] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Real Corner
Real Corner
Mate Preferences Seldomly Correlate With Real Mate Choices
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top