Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted Member 44" data-source="post: 10008" data-attributes="member: 44">Socionics intertypes relationshipsThe analysis of intertype relations is an integral part of Socionics. Just by knowing the Psychological Types of two people allows one to forecast the major developments of their relationship.Socionics intertype relations describe relationship between Psychological Types of people and not between the actual people. This is the reason these relations are called &quot;intertype&quot; relations. The relations between actual people are complicated and depend on many different factors. The intertype relations, however, form the core of any relationship and describe various degrees of psychological compatibility between people according to their Types.People with incompatible Types have more problems with their relationship than people with compatible Types. So if you are already in a relationship (especially the one you cannot get out easily, like family for example), knowing the intertype relations mechanism can help you to avoid many problems created by incompatible types. If you are single and looking, knowing intertype relations can help you to make the right choice.LIST OF INTERTYPE RELATIONSHIPS RANKED BY LVL OF CONFORT :Very goodDuality, activation, identical, mirrorGoodSemi duality, mirageAverageLook alike / business, benefactor, supervisor (you are), benifaciary, kindredBelow average Supervisee, contrary, quasi identicalBad Conflictor, super ego<h2>Relations vs. Relationships</h2>It is common for people to get into the habit of equating intertype interaction (or 'relations,' as it is usually called) with the more everyday concept of relationship. Here is what <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Bukalov,_Aleksandr" target="_blank">Aleksandr Bukalov</a> and <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Karpenko,_Olga&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" target="_blank">Olga Karpenko</a> of the <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=International_Institute_of_Socionics" target="_blank">International Institute of Socionics</a> had to say about the difference between information interaction between types and relationships:A.B. - Anyway, Aushra wrote several more works, such as The Socion, The Theory of Intertype Relations, and lengthy descriptions of several types, where she examined in detail how the information model of the psyche works for each type, how intertype relations work and how they manifest themselves — or, to be precise, &quot;intertype information interaction,&quot; out of which, on a subjective level, arise relationships. That's how we've formulated it in recent years.O.K. - In order to separate relationships from their information component.A.B. - Yes, information interaction and how relationships feel subjectively are not exactly the same. Aushra mixed the two, but that's natural. <a href="http://www.socionics.us/interviews/bukalov.shtml" target="_blank">[1]</a>Many socionics hobbyists eventually come to realization that congruence of TIMs, or types of information metabolism, does not translate to developing a close intimate relationships or romantic feelings for another person. The table of intertype relations can be applied to different types of social interaction.Compatibility of types of information metabolism (i.e. socionics types) also does not prevent people form ever having arguments or conflicting with one another. Having compatible types of information metabolism merely increases the chances of both people being receptive to communication with one another. Many also report that even if they enter into an argument with someone of congruent TIM they feel like they have a better understanding of where the other person is coming from than when they argue with someone of less compatible TIM.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted Member 44, post: 10008, member: 44"] [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][SIZE=6][U]Socionics intertypes relationships[/U][/SIZE][/COLOR][/B] [U][B]The analysis of intertype relations is an integral part of Socionics. Just by knowing the Psychological Types of two people allows one to forecast the major developments of their relationship. Socionics intertype relations describe relationship between Psychological Types of people and not between the actual people. This is the reason these relations are called "intertype" relations. The relations between actual people are complicated and depend on many different factors. The intertype relations, however, form the core of any relationship and describe various degrees of psychological compatibility between people according to their Types.[/B][/U] [B][U]People with incompatible Types have more problems with their relationship than people with compatible Types. So if you are already in a relationship (especially the one you cannot get out easily, like family for example), knowing the intertype relations mechanism can help you to avoid many problems created by incompatible types. If you are single and looking, knowing intertype relations can help you to make the right choice.[/U] LIST OF INTERTYPE RELATIONSHIPS RANKED BY LVL OF CONFORT : Very good[/B] Duality, activation, identical, mirror [B]Good[/B] Semi duality, mirage [B]Average[/B] Look alike / business, benefactor, supervisor (you are), benifaciary, kindred [B]Below average [/B] Supervisee, contrary, quasi identical [B]Bad [/B] Conflictor, super ego [HEADING=1]Relations vs. Relationships[/HEADING] It is common for people to get into the habit of equating intertype interaction (or 'relations,' as it is usually called) with the more everyday concept of [I]relationship[/I]. Here is what [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Bukalov,_Aleksandr']Aleksandr Bukalov[/URL] and [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Karpenko,_Olga&action=edit&redlink=1']Olga Karpenko[/URL] of the [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=International_Institute_of_Socionics']International Institute of Socionics[/URL] had to say about the difference between information interaction between types and relationships: A.B. - Anyway, Aushra wrote several more works, such as [I]The Socion[/I], [I]The Theory of Intertype Relations[/I], and lengthy descriptions of several types, where she examined in detail how the information model of the psyche works for each type, how intertype relations work and how they manifest themselves — or, to be precise, "intertype information interaction," out of which, on a subjective level, arise relationships. That's how we've formulated it in recent years.O.K. - In order to separate relationships from their information component.A.B. - Yes, information interaction and how relationships feel subjectively are not exactly the same. Aushra mixed the two, but that's natural. [URL='http://www.socionics.us/interviews/bukalov.shtml'][1][/URL] Many socionics hobbyists eventually come to realization that congruence of TIMs, or types of information metabolism, does not translate to developing a close intimate relationships or romantic feelings for another person. The table of intertype relations can be applied to different types of social interaction. Compatibility of types of information metabolism (i.e. socionics types) also does not prevent people form ever having arguments or conflicting with one another. Having compatible types of information metabolism merely increases the chances of both people being receptive to communication with one another. Many also report that even if they enter into an argument with someone of congruent TIM they feel like they have a better understanding of where the other person is coming from than when they argue with someone of less compatible TIM. [/QUOTE]

Verification