Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Menu
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Real Corner
Real Corner
Impractical (unless ur rich) theory: royal jelly based diet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ㅤYou" data-source="post: 124806" data-attributes="member: 947"><p>Queen bees appear to age much slower than worker bees, and can live over 5 years. And when the queen dies, it is because she stops producing eggs and so workers betray the queen. So a queen doesn’t die of old age per se. In contrast, the workers live a few weeks or a few months at maximum, if they live to old age. So they age much faster. The workers eat bee bread whereas the queen only eats royal jelly. Therefore, we can assume that the royal jelly has been crafted from millions of years of evolution to support both longevity and fertility. </p><p></p><p>When people consume royal jelly, they take like usually under a gram or few grams at most. This is a tiny fraction of the human diet, and not comparable to the diet that extends the lifespan of bees. Additionally, consumers and scientists often utilize previously frozen or powdered royal jelly, which would presumeably have altered bioactive properties compared to raw royal jelly the queen naturally consumes.</p><p></p><p>My theory is that if a human ate a diet consisting mostly of raw royal jelly, it would confer a great extension of lifespan and healthspan.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ㅤYou, post: 124806, member: 947"] Queen bees appear to age much slower than worker bees, and can live over 5 years. And when the queen dies, it is because she stops producing eggs and so workers betray the queen. So a queen doesn’t die of old age per se. In contrast, the workers live a few weeks or a few months at maximum, if they live to old age. So they age much faster. The workers eat bee bread whereas the queen only eats royal jelly. Therefore, we can assume that the royal jelly has been crafted from millions of years of evolution to support both longevity and fertility. When people consume royal jelly, they take like usually under a gram or few grams at most. This is a tiny fraction of the human diet, and not comparable to the diet that extends the lifespan of bees. Additionally, consumers and scientists often utilize previously frozen or powdered royal jelly, which would presumeably have altered bioactive properties compared to raw royal jelly the queen naturally consumes. My theory is that if a human ate a diet consisting mostly of raw royal jelly, it would confer a great extension of lifespan and healthspan. [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Real Corner
Real Corner
Impractical (unless ur rich) theory: royal jelly based diet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top