Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Deleted Member 44" data-source="post: 34767" data-attributes="member: 44">Despite what been said everywhere. Checked Gulenko typing he have him as ILI.He actually seemed more ILI or LII at first to me when was in process to find my own type ect but I really didn't know much . Idk he seemed obviously more introverted&nbsp; to me not ILE energy but there is so little footage of him. He look more ILI in the eyes too the look of victimization idk how to really explain tbh.Then i saw him being typed ILE everywhere in descriptions for ILE was used as main example everytime ect but a lot of those are old but idk i just took it and assumed he was ILE.Its related to this made a thread about some socionics issues<h3>ILE bias</h3>The <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE" target="_blank">ILE</a> bias comes from <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Augusta" target="_blank">Augusta</a> herself and is closely related to the one above. According to Augusta's original conception of type roles, <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE" target="_blank">ILEs</a> were seen as being a type that sees the hidden roots of phenomena (supposedly NE) and arranges them into a system or theory (TI). For many years <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Augusta" target="_blank">Augusta</a> and her associates assumed that scientists and thinkers who generated new theories were <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE" target="_blank">ILEs</a> (people like <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Einstein,_Albert&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" target="_blank">Einstein</a>, <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Bohr,_Niels&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" target="_blank">Bohr</a>, <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Newton,_Isaac&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" target="_blank">Newton</a>, and <a href="http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Darwin,_Charles&amp;action=edit&amp;redlink=1" target="_blank">Darwin</a>). Later, she and others seemed to recognize this mistake, but the ILE bias has still not been completely undone. Just as &quot;health&quot; does not equate exactly to SI &quot;theory&quot; does not equate exactly to TI, and people of different types may tend to generate theories of a slightly different nature.Full thread [URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://rnc.life/threads/socionics-issues.7319/[/URL]Now peoples discuss but me I'll go with ILI.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Deleted Member 44, post: 34767, member: 44"] Despite what been said everywhere. Checked Gulenko typing he have him as ILI. He actually seemed more ILI or LII at first to me when was in process to find my own type ect but I really didn't know much . Idk he seemed obviously more introverted to me not ILE energy but there is so little footage of him. He look more ILI in the eyes too the look of victimization idk how to really explain tbh. Then i saw him being typed ILE everywhere in descriptions for ILE was used as main example everytime ect but a lot of those are old but idk i just took it and assumed he was ILE. Its related to this made a thread about some socionics issues [HEADING=2]ILE bias[/HEADING] The [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE']ILE[/URL] bias comes from [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Augusta']Augusta[/URL] herself and is closely related to the one above. According to Augusta's original conception of type roles, [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE']ILEs[/URL] were seen as being a type that sees the hidden roots of phenomena (supposedly NE) and arranges them into a system or theory (TI). For many years [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Augusta']Augusta[/URL] and her associates assumed that scientists and thinkers who generated new theories were [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=ILE']ILEs[/URL] (people like [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Einstein,_Albert&action=edit&redlink=1']Einstein[/URL], [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Bohr,_Niels&action=edit&redlink=1']Bohr[/URL], [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Newton,_Isaac&action=edit&redlink=1']Newton[/URL], and [URL='http://wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=Darwin,_Charles&action=edit&redlink=1']Darwin[/URL]). Later, she and others seemed to recognize this mistake, but the ILE bias has still not been completely undone. Just as "health" does not equate exactly to SI "theory" does not equate exactly to TI, and people of different types may tend to generate theories of a slightly different nature. Full thread [URL unfurl="true"]https://rnc.life/threads/socionics-issues.7319/[/URL] Now peoples discuss but me I'll go with ILI. [/QUOTE]

Verification