Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Menu
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Real Corner
Socionics Corner
@daquan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted Member 44" data-source="post: 14487" data-attributes="member: 44"><p>Kj i really think you should put back the sticky threads the way they were put before or make a section.</p><p></p><p>If you think sticky threads takes too much place then make a section for sticky threads.</p><p></p><p>But the sticky threads should always be higher quality, if people come see them its cause they really want information. They will read it. It's still better for them than to read something that don't make sense to them.</p><p></p><p>It make no sense to put simpler threads as sticky and the one with the more information that explains the concept as normal threads</p><p></p><p>Warlow looked and it made no sense to him and obviously with such simplifications.</p><p></p><p> Litteraly the questions he asked in that thread, the answers were in the very first post in my thread about intertypes relationships and i put this part in bold character. It's cause i already anticipated that would be the first questions peoples would ask themselves. I put those threads in a way as they are the most convincing possible to new people but also simpler.</p><p></p><p><span class="uw_large_emoji">You're going to have to make one section for sticky anyway something like a bobt not just for socionics but everything in this forum at some point .</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted Member 44, post: 14487, member: 44"] Kj i really think you should put back the sticky threads the way they were put before or make a section. If you think sticky threads takes too much place then make a section for sticky threads. But the sticky threads should always be higher quality, if people come see them its cause they really want information. They will read it. It's still better for them than to read something that don't make sense to them. It make no sense to put simpler threads as sticky and the one with the more information that explains the concept as normal threads Warlow looked and it made no sense to him and obviously with such simplifications. Litteraly the questions he asked in that thread, the answers were in the very first post in my thread about intertypes relationships and i put this part in bold character. It's cause i already anticipated that would be the first questions peoples would ask themselves. I put those threads in a way as they are the most convincing possible to new people but also simpler. [UWSL]You're going to have to make one section for sticky anyway something like a bobt not just for socionics but everything in this forum at some point .[/UWSL] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Real Corner
Socionics Corner
@daquan
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top