@daquan

I think we've got too many sticky threads, and thus, it's a bit hard to navigate

do you think you could make a massive megathread of all things currently and future sticky-worthy threads?

@Daquan

Hold on

KJ said:

I think we've got too many sticky threads, and thus, it's a bit hard to navigate

do you think you could make a massive megathread of all things currently and future sticky-worthy threads?

@Daquan

Click to expand...

I think it's better if you make another section for those threads. A Megathread idk i think it'll look chaotic mixing everything

Kj i really think you should put back the sticky threads the way they were put before or make a section.

If you think sticky threads takes too much place then make a section for sticky threads.

But the sticky threads should always be higher quality, if people come see them its cause they really want information. They will read it. It's still better for them than to read something that don't make sense to them.

It make no sense to put simpler threads as sticky and the one with the more information that explains the concept as normal threads

Warlow looked and it made no sense to him and obviously with such simplifications.

Litteraly the questions he asked in that thread, the answers were in the very first post in my thread about intertypes relationships and i put this part in bold character. It's cause i already anticipated that would be the first questions peoples would ask themselves. I put those threads in a way as they are the most convincing possible to new people but also simpler.

You're going to have to make one section for sticky anyway something like a bobt not just for socionics but everything in this forum at some point .

I still think those treads you made are a good alternative but you get my point i believe the section being a bit hard to navigate is a secondary matter compared to the presentation of the concept in itself for obvious reasons.