Twitter
youtube
Discord
Contact us
Menu
Forums
New posts
Trending
Rules
Explore
Bioenergetic Wiki
Bioenergetic Life Search
Bioprovement Peat Search
Ray Peat Interviews by Danny Roddy
Master List: Ray Peat, PhD Interviews & Quotes by FPS
Traveling Resources
Google Flights
Wiki Voyage
DeepL Translator
Niche
Numbeo
Merch
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search engine:
Threadloom Search
XenForo Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Trending
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Light/Dark Mode
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Information
World News
Chris Brown & Drake Fire Back At "Egotistical" Claim In "No Guidance" Lawsuit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HotNewHipHop" data-source="post: 10848" data-attributes="member: 83"><p>After years of<a href="https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-reflects-on-turbulent-history-with-chris-brown-news.109885.html" target="_blank"> feuding</a>, Drake and Chris Brown finally settled their feud and commemorated the occasion with "No Guidance." The single appeared on Breezy's <em>Indigo</em> album and dominated the summer of 2019. Unfortunately, the single's success has led to <a href="https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-and-chris-brown-catch-copyright-infringement-lawsuit-over-no-guidance-news.140492.html" target="_blank">a lawsuit against both artists</a> who are being accused of ripping off Braindon Cooper's 2016 single, "I Love Your Dress."</p><p></p><h4><img src="https://ssl.ulximg.com/public/userfiles/2022/03/16/GettyImages-1076365994.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></h4> <h4><em>Vivien Killilea/Getty Images</em></h4><p></p><p>Last month, Cooper claimed that it was "both egotistical and without any legal basis whatsoever" to claim that Breezy and Drizzy didn't have "plausible" to his single. However, attorneys for both artists are demanding a dismissal, describing Cooper's record as an "obscure song" that contain<a href="https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-and-chris-brown-get-melodic-in-new-song-preview-news.79256.html" target="_blank">s a common phrase like "You got it."</a> The attorneys for the multi-platinum-selling artists claimed that he can't "exercise a monopoly" over the phrase.</p><p></p><p>"This is not a close call,” Brown’s lawyer James G. Sammataro's wrote in a filing for the case, claiming that posting a song on the Internet -- one of 82 million on Spotify -- and performing said song live does "not constitute widespread dissemination as a matter of law.”</p><p></p><p>Sammataro dives deeper into the allegations that Cooper sent his song to an A&R who allegedly has ties to Birdman named Mic Tee, who previously worked under the AMAG Collective. Sammataro shut down allegations that Drake and Breezy heard the song through Mic Tee as "conjectural and speculative." Sammataro also went into dismantle arguments that Tee told Cooper to travel to Drake's hometown of Toronto that the plaintiff suggested played some sort of role in the copyright infringement.</p><p></p><p>"Plaintiffs’ allegation that Mic Tee suggested that Cooper travel to Toronto, Drake’s ‘original hometown,’ is insufficient to permit an inference of access. By plaintiffs’ own account, Drake has resided in California since 2014. In any event, there is no allegation that Cooper went to Toronto, and it is implausible to assume that every musician in Toronto collaborates and shares music with Drake," the filing reads.</p><p></p><p>We'll keep you posted on more updates regarding the case. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/chris-brown-drake-no-guidance-copyright-lawsuit-1322215/" target="_blank">[Via]</a></p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/chris-brown-and-drake-fire-back-at-egotistical-claim-in-no-guidance-lawsuit-news.149206.html" target="_blank">Continue reading...</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HotNewHipHop, post: 10848, member: 83"] After years of[URL='https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-reflects-on-turbulent-history-with-chris-brown-news.109885.html'] feuding[/URL], Drake and Chris Brown finally settled their feud and commemorated the occasion with "No Guidance." The single appeared on Breezy's [I]Indigo[/I] album and dominated the summer of 2019. Unfortunately, the single's success has led to [URL='https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-and-chris-brown-catch-copyright-infringement-lawsuit-over-no-guidance-news.140492.html']a lawsuit against both artists[/URL] who are being accused of ripping off Braindon Cooper's 2016 single, "I Love Your Dress." [HEADING=3][IMG]https://ssl.ulximg.com/public/userfiles/2022/03/16/GettyImages-1076365994.jpg[/IMG] [I]Vivien Killilea/Getty Images[/I][/HEADING] Last month, Cooper claimed that it was "both egotistical and without any legal basis whatsoever" to claim that Breezy and Drizzy didn't have "plausible" to his single. However, attorneys for both artists are demanding a dismissal, describing Cooper's record as an "obscure song" that contain[URL='https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/drake-and-chris-brown-get-melodic-in-new-song-preview-news.79256.html']s a common phrase like "You got it."[/URL] The attorneys for the multi-platinum-selling artists claimed that he can't "exercise a monopoly" over the phrase. "This is not a close call,” Brown’s lawyer James G. Sammataro's wrote in a filing for the case, claiming that posting a song on the Internet -- one of 82 million on Spotify -- and performing said song live does "not constitute widespread dissemination as a matter of law.” Sammataro dives deeper into the allegations that Cooper sent his song to an A&R who allegedly has ties to Birdman named Mic Tee, who previously worked under the AMAG Collective. Sammataro shut down allegations that Drake and Breezy heard the song through Mic Tee as "conjectural and speculative." Sammataro also went into dismantle arguments that Tee told Cooper to travel to Drake's hometown of Toronto that the plaintiff suggested played some sort of role in the copyright infringement. "Plaintiffs’ allegation that Mic Tee suggested that Cooper travel to Toronto, Drake’s ‘original hometown,’ is insufficient to permit an inference of access. By plaintiffs’ own account, Drake has resided in California since 2014. In any event, there is no allegation that Cooper went to Toronto, and it is implausible to assume that every musician in Toronto collaborates and shares music with Drake," the filing reads. We'll keep you posted on more updates regarding the case. [URL='https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/chris-brown-drake-no-guidance-copyright-lawsuit-1322215/'][Via][/URL] [url="https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/chris-brown-and-drake-fire-back-at-egotistical-claim-in-no-guidance-lawsuit-news.149206.html"]Continue reading...[/url] [/QUOTE]
Loading…
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Information
World News
Chris Brown & Drake Fire Back At "Egotistical" Claim In "No Guidance" Lawsuit
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top