Doesn't seem like itThere is only one Taliban
Those are Muslim extremist groups not branches of the TalibanDoesn't seem like it
Islamic Jihad Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgHezb-e Islami Gulbuddin - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIslamic Jihad Union - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgHaqqani network - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIslamic Movement of Uzbekistan - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgAl-Qaeda - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgFidai Mahaz - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIslamic State – Khorasan Province - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org055 Brigade - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgal-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgAnsar Dine - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgBoko Haram - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIslamic State - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgMovement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgRas Kamboni Brigades - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgAl-Itihaad al-Islamiya - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgMahdi Army - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgSpecial Groups (Iraq) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgJamaat Ansar al-Sunna - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.orgIslamic Army in Iraq - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
there's a few Taliban splinter groups in thereThose are Muslim extremist groups not branches of the Taliban
The Special groups in Iraq are the ones that fight off ISISthere's a few Taliban splinter groups in there
They are indeed terrorist groups under the current definition:The Special groups in Iraq are the ones that fight off ISIS
Low IQ of them to be labeled a terrorist organization
Any movement that’s against turning the country in to le democratic exotic whore house for American politicians and business men is labeled terrorist.
They are indeed terrorist groups under the current definition:
'the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.'
They wouldn't be labeled a terrorist group if they only opposed democracy though.
Does whatHow is it not terrorism when the USA does it
Source? The invasions were targeting terrorist groups, not civilians if I recall correctly.George Bush claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq
Does what
Source? The invasions were targeting terrorist groups, not civilians if I recall correctly.
The US government did not purposely instill fear in the civilian population, they did the opposite on many occasions. Public opinion-wise, we were actually a highly favored country to many Afghan citizens according to this 05-06 poll: https://web.archive.org/web/20070118054125/http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbc06-3/index.htmlthe unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.'
Yes, I do not deny the accidental, and sometimes purposeful war crimes, but as a whole, the US did not purposefully set out to harm Afghan citizens to establish a political agenda.Many civilians were killed in US drone strikes
Elab more on this?and political instability caused by US funding of counter soviet organizations later labeled as terrorist
The government they established was extremely corrupt, local war lords abused power same as the Taliban would dThe US government did not purposely instill fear in the civilian population, they did the opposite on many occasions. Public opinion-wise, we were actually a highly favored country to many Afghan citizens according to this 05-06 poll: https://web.archive.org/web/20070118054125/http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbc06-3/index.html
There’s always a political agenda look what the British did to India. There are breeding parties now for white man to cuck Indian men so they can raise a light skin baby this is all because Great Britain ram BWC game in India for so long, same with the Philippines Vietnam Korea Beijing even Mexico and JapanYes, I do not deny the accidental, and sometimes purposeful war crimes, but as a whole, the US did not purposefully set out to harm Afghan citizens to establish a political agenda.
Taking down a Hussein led to ISIS trying to take control and Shia militant forces kicking them outElab more on this?
Are you referring to TISA or the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan? Do you have proof?The government they established was extremely corrupt
In this context, at first, there was no clear one but the original goal was the extradition of Osama, Taliban denied the extradition, the goal that followed was indeed a democratic political agenda that was not achieved by harming civilians, so, by that purpose, the coalition was not a terrorist one.There’s always a political agenda
That is true.Taking down a Hussein led to ISIS trying to take control and Shia militant forces kicking them out
Yes, the US supported the Sunni mujahideen, how did that lead to the creation of the Taliban though?American funding of counter Soviet forces led to Taliban creation
His father founded the Saudi Bin Ladin Group, how do you know of his funding?Bin laden was the son of a Saudi Oil Sheik, Saudis have been caught countless times funding terrorist organizations why do you think the Taliban fly their flag now,
What Saudis exactly?America continues to do business with Saudis while labeling countries like Iran and Iraq as terrorists for fighting off ISIS and trying to create an independent government